Skip to content Skip to footer

Female Leadership in Web3: Building Trust, Breaking Bias – featuring Lisa Gibbons, Ioana Surpateanu, Mariana de la Roche Wills & Sandy Carter

In a sector that promises decentralisation but often replicates old hierarchies, four women are reshaping what leadership looks like. Their stories show that progress is not only possible but already underway.

In Web3, leadership is less about titles and more about the ability to act under pressure, bridge competing worlds, and shape outcomes with clarity. For women, that work often comes with added friction. Authority is still questioned, contributions are sometimes overlooked, and the bias that has long defined traditional industries has not vanished simply because blockchain is decentralised. Yet across the ecosystem, women are showing how to lead differently — and more effectively.

Lisa Gibbons, head of marketing at MeWe and founder of MTA, has felt those moments of doubt in real time, the sideways glance that asks if she belongs. She calls them micro-failures, the subtle slights that accumulate. But instead of retreating, she treated each one as material to build resilience and sharpen her response. That pragmatism echoes in Ioana Surpateanu, non-executive director at CryptoUK, who refuses to put much stock in the word “leadership” at all. For her, labels often reward conformity, not capability. Real influence comes when people respect your work ethic and see they can learn from you, regardless of gender.

All four women agree that decentralisation is not a cure-all. Gibbons frames it as a jigsaw of shared opportunities, but warns it only works if each piece is fitted with intention. Mariana de la Roche Wills, co-founder of BlackVogel, is even more blunt: decentralised systems risk replicating the same biases as legacy structures unless inclusion is designed in from the start. Surpateanu shares that caution. She has seen meritocracy in theory collapse under the weight of unwritten rules about who gets heard. Sandy Carter, Chief Operating Officer of Unstoppable Domains, points to the same danger. Web3 and AI can democratise access, she argues, but only if programmed with new intentions. Otherwise, old hierarchies simply appear in new wrappers.

The recurring word across their stories is trust. Web3 likes to describe itself as “trustless,” yet the reality is more complex. Surpateanu notes that durable outcomes still depend on people earning trust through consistency and reputation. De la Roche Wills finds the same: openness and integrity often carry more weight than technical assurances. Carter makes the link explicit: even in AI, which operates on logic and probability, adoption runs on trust. People need to believe not just in what you are building, but why you are building it.

Moments of underestimation cut across their experiences. Carter remembers stepping onto a stage and being mistaken for an event organiser, handed a glass of water by a fellow panelist who did not realise she was his equal. She turned the moment with grace and results, later reminding the room exactly who she was. De la Roche Wills describes being talked over and second-guessed not just as a woman but as a young migrant woman. Her answer was to remain anchored in facts, amplify her voice without aggression, and refuse silence. Gibbons too found herself questioned and chose to lead by example, while Surpateanu has learned to navigate those moments by reframing influence away from gender and back toward delivery.

What unites them is not a single style but a refusal to be defined by bias. Empathy is not weakness but strategy. Persistence is not stubbornness but survival. And translation — between grassroots and institutional worlds, between engineering and adoption, between male-dominated assumptions and female perspectives — is the hidden skill that allows Web3 to move forward.

Leadership in this space will not be defined by titles or slogans. It will be defined by those willing to act, to hold the line on values, and to insist that decentralisation must mean more than technology. In that sense, women are not only demanding seats at the table. They are rebuilding the table itself, shaping systems that may finally reflect the communities they serve.