Week 7 – Ioana Surpateanu of CryptoUK
As Web3 continues to redefine the architecture of the internet, finance, and governance, it brings with it the rare opportunity to rebuild systems from the ground up. But if we are to build better, fairer, more inclusive systems, we must actively spotlight, and support, women in leadership roles.
Historically underrepresented in both tech and finance, women leaders bring diverse perspectives, collaborative approaches, and often values-driven leadership that prioritizes long-term sustainability over short-term gain. In Web3, where decentralized decision-making, community building, and innovation are core tenets, this diversity of style is very welcome if not essential.
Leadership isn’t monolithic. While traditional models have often emphasized hierarchy, competition, and control, many women leaders bring alternative approaches: participatory, empathetic, consensus-driven, or mentorship-focused. These styles align naturally with the ethos of decentralization and trustless systems, offering a counterbalance to purely technocratic or profit-led strategies.
By highlighting women in Web3 leadership, founders, developers, policymakers, and community builders, we not only correct representation gaps but also signal to the next generation that there is no single path to power. Visibility shapes possibility. And in a space as fast-moving and foundational as Web3, ensuring a plurality of voices isn’t just ethical, it’s strategic.
For the next 12 Mondays we are going to bring you some of the most inspiring women in Web3 and explore how and why they think as they do.
Week 7: Ioana Surpateanu: rethinking authority and influence in Web3

Ioana Surpateanu, a non-executive director at CryptoUK, resists easy labels. She dislikes the word leadership because it is over-applied and often rewards conformity. “People will follow you if they genuinely believe they can learn from you or respect your work ethic,” she says. “Regardless of gender.”
She is unsentimental about the gender gap. In her view it persists less for reasons of capability and more because the industry still prizes a set of unspoken prerequisites that many women do not meet or do not wish to meet. She leaves the point deliberately cryptic. The message is clear: what is rewarded is not always what creates value.
On decentralisation she is cautious and hopeful. “Decentralisation isn’t yet mature or widespread enough to drive fundamental change,” she says. “But I remain hopeful.” Education on first principles matters. Web3 can be meritocratic, but the definition of merit varies across communities and is still evolving.
Asked if her authority has been challenged because she is a woman, she avoids drama. Not overtly, she says. The issue tends to surface in conflict, which is common in startup environments. That is when old assumptions reappear about how assertive women will be under pressure. For Surpateanu the question is less about capability and more about perception in high-stress moments.
Trust remains central, even in a sector that talks about trustlessness. “We don’t yet have a truly trustless ecosystem,” she says. Technical assurances help, but durable outcomes still depend on people who earn trust through consistency, delivery and reputation. Relationship-building is not inherently gendered. It depends on knowing the social codes of each community and moving between them with fluency.
Her advice to women considering the sector is practical. Assume you will learn quickly. Crypto has a way of accelerating both knowledge and initiative. A non-technical perspective can be valuable to teams deep in engineering problems because it reframes the question around users, markets and outcomes.
Surpateanu’s own network formed at the edges. She was a rebellious corporate operator trying to pull a traditional employer toward crypto. The people who backed her were early community builders and “degens”, many of whom remain friends. For the next generation she wants stronger bridges between those early adopters and women arriving from more structured environments.
She moves comfortably between grassroots communities and institutional rooms and thinks the sector needs both. If Web3 were to become entirely institutional it would lose the edge that keeps it dynamic. If it stays only at the fringe it will struggle to scale. The job is to hold the tension and use it productively.
Her stance on AI and blockchain governance follows the same logic. More women should be at the table, not as gesture but for outcomes: breadth of perspective improves decisions. Being a woman does not make one more ethical; it can make one more nuanced about trade-offs. The requirement is fluency—understand the technologies deeply enough to shape them.
Asked for guidance to younger women, Surpateanu reduces it to three lessons, delivered without ceremony. “You’re young, take advantage of that: try widely, fail fast, learn quickly.” Failure, she adds, is not a verdict but a teacher: “Don’t fear failure; it’s the best teacher.” And on ambition, she is precise: “Don’t aim to be a leader. Aim to be the sharpest, most honest version of yourself, leadership will follow.”

